Archive for March 25th, 2007

Enneagram and The West Wing

I was thinking the other day about the Enneagram - something that Alison and I have been reading about off and on for a while* - and wondered about the characters in the West Wing and what their types are.  To my absolute amazement, there seem to be no real posts about this out in Blogdom or on the Enneagram websites.  There’s stuff for Star Trek and Star Wars, but not for the West Wing.  So, here goes.  Please comment if you know Enneagram and the programme:

President Jed Bartlett: 6w5: He’s really stable most of the time but can become a bit counter-phobic and needs pressing to make important decisions.  When he’s depressed he  really goes to his 5 wing - very studious and introspective.

First Lady Abigail Bartlett: 3w2: This was a tricky one as she’s an exceptional scientist so could also be a 1 (perfectionist), an 8 (the boss) or a 5 (scientist), but I think she’s an achiever with a helping wing.  Interesting how she interacts with CJ who I describe below as a 2w3.  When Abby’s pushed - she moves towards caring - when she’s her own woman - she climbs the heights of her field of medicine.

Leo McGarry: 8w9: First of the strong character types - he’s the boss, but has some of this rounded off by being a bit of a peacemaker at times.  He’ll challenge Bartlett at times, but he’s a mostly reformed 8.  His motivation for anger has been channeled into the love of his country and serving at the pleasure of the president.  He respects decisions made by his staff as long as they can stand up for them.

Josh Lyman: 8w9: I think Josh is the same as Leo - which is what makes their working relationship so intriguing.  He is so, so angry - particularly with Republicans!  He can’t seem to form any kind of romantic bond properly and we see two relationships with strong women either not start (Joey) or fall apart (Amy), until right at the end of the last series (won’t say who in case you’ve not seen it all, but you can probably guess).

Toby Ziegler: 4w5: He’s a very introspective, emotional type who goes to his 5 wing (perhaps why he and the president can communicate) when pressured.

Sam Seaborn: 1w2: I’m pretty sure that Sam is a 1 - a total perfectionist.  He might be a 5, but I can’t quite figure that one out.  His wing is likely to be a 2 as he’s very much the helper than the peacemaker.

Donatella Moss: 9w8: I think this is a particularly funny one as we have friends who are 8w7 and 9w8 - almost Josh and Dona, but not really - they’re much nicer. Dona brings a lot of peace to Josh’s anger - though can also go head to head with him and gives as good as she gets.  She likes things to go well, but will stand up for herself.

CJ Cregg: 2w3: I’m not sure about CJ.  I think I need some help on this one.  She’s very caring and does what she thinks is best - but often is overtaken by events in her job and can become quite spiky.  Push a 2 and see where they go - do they seek to overcompensate by achieving or do they try to be perfect?  I think that when CJ’s pushed, she tries to stand her ground and make sure people tell her that she’s good at what she does.  Alternative is that she might be a 3w2.

I don’t know if I’m putting too much emphasis on their wings in order to make up for not knowing enough about their personalities, but having spent the last seven years with them, I think I know them a bit.  Perhaps you know them a bit more - or know more about the Enneagram.  Would love to know what you think.

4 comments March 25th, 2007

Environmental taxonomy

The second area Gordon could have worked some tax wonders was with the environment.

It’s easy to say that the polluter should pay - though does this really work? We all think that multinationals like BP, Shell, etc., should pay more if they pump nasties into the biosphere, but what about us? If you take the principle to the logical conclusion, we should pay more tax for the amount of rubbish we produce and pay more tax on the fuel that we use.

I wonder whether consumers are motivated more by ease and pleasure than by saving money. We could all save a lot of money by not going on nice holidays to somewhere warm and most of the people I know who drive could save lots by driving smaller cars - but the thing is - we don’t.

2. Reduce tax for good behaviour - 1p/£1 for each category
If we were to be encouraged to do good rather than punished for being bad, I wonder whether we’d do better. We could get tax breaks for doing good stuff. Perhaps a penny off income tax if you use public transport, another penny off if you reach recycling targets and a penny off if you switch to alternative energy use.

Companies could be encouraged by doing the same - less corporation tax if they behave well - rather than considering it as an extra cost. By giving a carrot rather than a stick, consumers and companies would have a reason to do good.

If you meet all the good criteria you have more money to spend to boost the economy (potentially inflationary) or to put into pensions / investments / savings.  You will probably have spent some money to achieve some of the criteria needed to get the reductions in tax.

It might be that the reductions in your own pollution comes off your council tax rather than your income tax, but then that’s a topic for the next post . . . how to get your tax from you.

Add comment March 25th, 2007

Calendar

March 2007
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category